Ok, Um. I’m speechless. Almost.
Apparently, this is a “thing.” By “thing” I mean a current phenomenon in popular culture. A culture I am increasingly agitated about.
I came across a post in my Facebook feed by Perkins School of Theology biblical interpretation professor and feminist author Jaime Clark-Soles. She is, and many of my friends are, appalled by a mandatory assembly her teenaged daughter was made to attend in her public school in Richardson, TX. It’s called R U Dateable. See what I mean? We’re not even using words here.
Here is the link to the “rules” on the website for this phenomenon.
Gross…Eww. Stop it with they misogynistic, gender biased based “rules” for dating. It makes me want to vomit.
Here is Dr. Clark-Sole’s reaction to finding out about this event on her Facebook page.
“I am speechless here in Richardson, TX. Richardson High School (which has a new principal) is making my daughter miss her Math class tomorrow (and shorten the other classes) without any notice to the parents, in a public school, to be subjected to some misogynistic religious speaker named Justin Lookadoo who wants her to sign “Dateable Rules” that include Rule #6: “Dateable girls know how to shut up” (literally) and “letting the guy lead” because boys are adventuresome and girls are soft and gentle. Clearly, we are writing the principal as a first step. Obviously, we have given Chloe permission to stage a walkout. If you have practical suggestions about the next steps we should take (I mean this in a deadly serious way, not joking), please advise.”
She has been working the past couple days to find a way to stop or opt-out of the event. At print time of this blog, it looks like the event is still on, but now parents may opt-out their children from the assembly.
Over a decade ago, as a teenager, I was subjected to a similar situation. As many readers know, I attended a private, conservative Christian school for most of my young life. It was awful, and we’ll leave it at that. About the 9th grade, under a new principle (one later fired for porn on his computer), we were corralled into the gym, boys and girls together in several different grades, to have “sex ed.” This consisted of a series of videos and speakers that told us, and I’m paraphrasing a little, that if we have sex, we will die. I’ve had sex. I’m not dead or pregnant.
Ur gonna die!
It was extremely uncomfortable, not just because of the subject matter, but because of the motivation and undertone of the assembly. Our school’s leadership intended to undermine comprehensive sex education by presenting a patriarchal, abstinence-only view of the sexual relationship between men and women. In many sessions, the burden of sexual responsibility was placed on females. We, as the childbearers rather than breadwinners, are responsible for being modest, “lady-like” in appearance, allow men to lead and feel more important, know when to speak when spoken to. The very things listed in this silly “R U Datable” thing.
Ugh.
I feel icky and tired now. Go forth and be angry for me!